Hi
Laura,
Don’t know if you can
use any of this or not, but here goes… Please let me know if you have any
questions.
From:
owner-directors@lists.webster.edu [mailto:owner-directors@lists.webster.edu]
On Behalf Of Laura
Rein
Sent: Friday, March 09,
2007 10:35 AM
To:
directors@lists.webster.edu
Cc:
'Kathy Marlock'
Subject: Input
for HLC Self-Study Requested
Dear Directors:
As co-chairs of the Higher Learning Commission
Self-Study Subcommittee for Criterion Three—Student Learning and Effective
Teaching—we are asking for a few minutes of your time to fill in the following
table, particularly sections 3b and 3c below. We will be gathering
information on all of the components--3a through 3d--from many University units
ranging from the schools and colleges to support offices, but we would also like
input from your campuses, particularly for 3b and 3c—Recognizing and Supporting
Effective Teaching and Creating Effective Learning Environments. If you
also have information specific to your campus that you would like share on 3a
and 3d as well, we certainly welcome it. To make your job easier, we
require only bulleted lists of items that you believe comprise evidence similar
to and in addition to the examples of evidence provided for each component in
the left column. In the middle column is a list of evidence we are
gathering already from the University. Enter your evidence in the right-
hand column and return this email as a reply with supporting documents included
as attachments. Page down to see all 4 components in Criterion Three. Many
thanks for your help. If you can return this by April 1, we would
appreciate it.
Best,
Laura Rein, Dean of University Library, and Kathy
Marlock, Director of Academic Assessment
Co-Chairs, Criterion Three
Subcommittee
Criterion
Three Student Learning and Effective Teaching: The
organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching effectiveness
that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational
mission.
|
Core
Component - 3a The
organization’s goals for student learning outcomes are clearly stated for
each educational program and make effective assessment possible.
|
Evidence
from University |
Evidence
from your campus | |
|
Examples
of Evidence
●
The
organization clearly differentiates its learning goals for undergraduate,
graduate, and post-baccalaureate programs by identifying the expected
learning outcomes for each. ●
Assessment
of student learning provides evidence at multiple levels: course, program,
and institutional. ●
Assessment
of student learning includes multiple direct and indirect measures of
student learning. ●
Results
obtained through assessment of student learning are available to
appropriate constituencies, including students themselves.
●
The
organization integrates into its assessment of student learning the data
reported for purposes of external accountability (e.g., graduation rates,
passage rates on licensing exams, placement rates, transfer rates).
●
The
organization’s assessment of student learning extends to all educational
offerings, including credit and noncredit certificate programs.
●
Faculty
are involved in defining expected student learning outcomes and creating
the strategies to determine whether those outcomes are achieved.
●
Faculty
and administrators routinely review the effectiveness and uses of the
organization’s program to assess student
learning. |
Assessment
Excellence Report NCATE ASBSP NSSE Programs
reviews Reports
from Career Services and Alumni Office Curriculum
Committee process Graduate
Council School
and College assessment teams General
Ed Assessment |
Syllabi
from CAS list Course Objectives to further amplify the course
description and Learning Objectives to list the salient points required
for content mastery. (COUN 5020
attached.) Syllabi
from SBT list the Intent of the Course to further amplify the course
description and Course Level Learning Outcomes to list the salient points
required for content mastery. (HRDV 5000
attached.)
| |
|
Core
Component - 3b The
organization values and supports effective
teaching. |
Evidence
from University |
Evidence
from your campus | |
|
Examples
of Evidence
●
Qualified
faculty determine curricular content and strategies for instruction.
●
The
organization supports professional development designed to facilitate
teaching suited to varied learning environments. ●
The
organization evaluates teaching and recognizes effective teaching.
●
The
organization provides services to support improved pedagogies.
●
The
organization demonstrates openness to innovative practices that enhance
learning. ●
The
organization supports faculty in keeping abreast of the research on
teaching and learning, and of technological advances that can positively
affect student learning and the delivery of instruction.
●
Faculty
members actively participate in professional organizations relevant to the
disciplines they teach. |
Faculty
credentials and professional memberships and development
activities Committee
to Review Fac Process Fellowships Workshops,
Brownbags Fall
and Spring Faculty Institutes Regional
Faculty Meetings Information
Technology Support Instruction
Support Specialists Writing
Committee Faculty
travel and research funds Faculty
awards |
List
any specific ways your campus supports effective
teaching. List
any specific ways your campus recognizes faculty achievements
Please
attach electronic copies to this email of any supporting documents for
evidence you list. | |
|
Core
Component - 3c The
organization creates effective learning
environments. |
Evidence
from University |
Evidence
from your campus | |
|
Examples
of Evidence ●
Assessment
results inform improvements in curriculum, pedagogy, instructional
resources, and student services. ●
The
organization provides an environment that supports all learners and
respects the diversity they bring. ●
Advising
systems focus on student learning, including the mastery of skills
required for academic success. ●
Student
development programs support learning throughout the student’s experience
regardless of the location of the student. ●
The
organization employs, when appropriate, new technologies that enhance
effective learning environments for students. ●
The
organization’s systems of quality assurance include regular review of
whether its educational strategies, activities, processes, and
technologies enhance student learning. |
Assessment
documentation from fellowships Assessment
and surveys from support offices Multidisciplinary
studies International
studies Freshman
Seminars Adult
learning environments (night, weekend) Smart
classrooms Online
learning environment FDC
technologies Information
from extended campuses Advising
Center report Web
page design Student
affairs diversity activities Connections Internships Study
abroad |
List
any specific ways your campus creates effective learning environments in
or out of the classroom. Please
attach electronic copies to this email of any supporting documents for
evidence you list. | |
|
Core
Component - 3d The
organization’s learning resources support student learning and effective
teaching. |
Evidence
from University |
Evidence
from your campus | |
|
Examples
of Evidence ●
The
organization ensures access to the resources (e.g., research laboratories,
libraries, performance spaces, clinical practice sites) necessary to
support learning and teaching. ●
The
organization evaluates the use of its learning resources to enhance
student learning and effective teaching. ●
The
organization regularly assesses the effectiveness of its learning
resources to support learning and
teaching. ●
The
organization supports students, staff, and faculty in using technology
effectively. ●
The
organization provides effective staffing and support for its learning
resources. ●
The
organization’s systems and structures enable partnerships and innovations
that enhance student learning and strengthen teaching
effectiveness. ●
Budgeting
priorities reflect that improvement in teaching and learning is a core
value of the organization. |
Library
self-study and exhibits Lab/clinical
spaces-main and extended campuses Theater/dance/music
spaces/ Loretto-Hilton expansion Science
building plans SBT
building plans SOC
renovation plans Student
teaching Computer
labs—main and extended campuses IT
User Services FDC technology support Academic
Technology Committee University
partnerships (http://www.webster.edu/about/facts/partnerships)
Budget
data from FDC, IT, and Office of Assessment |
At
the ALBU/KIRT campuses we offer a mandatory New Student Orientation each
term. Students receive administrative information, receive an
introduction to research in the local area and then meet with their area
mentors. (New
Student Orientation PPT attached.) | |
|
|
|
|
|
Laura Rein, Dean of University
Library
Tel: 314.968.7152 Fax:
314.963.6085
Email: