From: Ellen Driber-Hassall [ellendh@webster.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:14 PM
To: lrein@webster.edu
Subject: FW: Input for HLC Self-Study Requested

Attachments: Nu Stu Orientation Feb 07.ppt; SP II 5020.htm; SP II HR 5000.htm

Hi Laura,

 

Don’t know if you can use any of this or not, but here goes…  Please let me know if you have any questions.

 


From: owner-directors@lists.webster.edu [mailto:owner-directors@lists.webster.edu] On Behalf Of Laura Rein
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 10:35 AM
To: directors@lists.webster.edu
Cc: 'Kathy Marlock'
Subject: Input for HLC Self-Study Requested

 

Dear Directors:

 

As co-chairs of the Higher Learning Commission Self-Study Subcommittee for Criterion Three—Student Learning and Effective Teaching—we are asking for a few minutes of your time to fill in the following table, particularly sections 3b and 3c below.  We will be gathering information on all of the components--3a through 3d--from many University units ranging from the schools and colleges to support offices, but we would also like input from your campuses, particularly for 3b and 3c—Recognizing and Supporting Effective Teaching and Creating Effective Learning Environments.  If you also have information specific to your campus that you would like share on 3a and 3d as well, we certainly welcome it.  To make your job easier, we require only bulleted lists of items that you believe comprise evidence similar to and in addition to the examples of evidence provided for each component in the left column.  In the middle column is a list of evidence we are gathering already from the University.  Enter your evidence in the right- hand column and return this email as a reply with supporting documents included as attachments. Page down to see all 4 components in Criterion Three. Many thanks for your help.  If you can return this by April 1, we would appreciate it.

 

Best,

 

Laura Rein, Dean of University Library, and Kathy Marlock, Director of Academic Assessment

Co-Chairs, Criterion Three Subcommittee

 

Criterion Three Student Learning and Effective Teaching:  The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission.

 

Core Component - 3a The organization’s goals for student learning outcomes are clearly stated for each educational program and make effective assessment possible.

 

Evidence from University

 

Evidence from your campus

Examples of Evidence The organization clearly differentiates its learning goals for undergraduate, graduate, and post-baccalaureate programs by identifying the expected learning outcomes for each. Assessment of student learning provides evidence at multiple levels: course, program, and institutional. Assessment of student learning includes multiple direct and indirect measures of student learning. Results obtained through assessment of student learning are available to appropriate constituencies, including students themselves. The organization integrates into its assessment of student learning the data reported for purposes of external accountability (e.g., graduation rates, passage rates on licensing exams, placement rates, transfer rates). The organization’s assessment of student learning extends to all educational offerings, including credit and noncredit certificate programs. Faculty are involved in defining expected student learning outcomes and creating the strategies to determine whether those outcomes are achieved. Faculty and administrators routinely review the effectiveness and uses of the organization’s program to assess student learning.

 

 

Assessment Excellence Report

NCATE

ASBSP

NSSE

Programs reviews

Reports from Career Services and Alumni Office

Curriculum Committee process

Graduate Council

School and College assessment teams

General Ed Assessment

 

 

Syllabi  from CAS list Course Objectives to further amplify the course description and Learning Objectives to list the salient points required for content mastery.  (COUN 5020 attached.)

 

Syllabi from SBT list the Intent of the Course to further amplify the course description and Course Level Learning Outcomes to list the salient points required for content mastery.  (HRDV 5000 attached.)

 

 

Core Component - 3b The organization values and supports effective teaching.

Evidence from University

Evidence from your campus

Examples of Evidence Qualified faculty determine curricular content and strategies for instruction. The organization supports professional development designed to facilitate teaching suited to varied learning environments. The organization evaluates teaching and recognizes effective teaching. The organization provides services to support improved pedagogies. The organization demonstrates openness to innovative practices that enhance learning. The organization supports faculty in keeping abreast of the research on teaching and learning, and of technological advances that can positively affect student learning and the delivery of instruction. Faculty members actively participate in professional organizations relevant to the disciplines they teach.

 

 

Faculty credentials and professional memberships and development activities

Committee to Review Fac Process

Faculty Development Center

Fellowships

Workshops, Brownbags

Fall and Spring Faculty Institutes

Regional Faculty Meetings

Information Technology Support

Instruction Support Specialists

Writing Committee

Faculty travel and research funds

Faculty awards

 

List any specific ways your campus supports effective teaching.

 

List any specific ways your campus recognizes faculty achievements

 

Please attach electronic copies to this email of any supporting documents for evidence you list.

Core Component - 3c The organization creates effective learning environments.

Evidence from University

Evidence from your campus

Examples of Evidence Assessment results inform improvements in curriculum, pedagogy, instructional resources, and student services. The organization provides an environment that supports all learners and respects the diversity they bring. Advising systems focus on student learning, including the mastery of skills required for academic success. Student development programs support learning throughout the student’s experience regardless of the location of the student. The organization employs, when appropriate, new technologies that enhance effective learning environments for students. The organization’s systems of quality assurance include regular review of whether its educational strategies, activities, processes, and technologies enhance student learning.

 

 

Assessment documentation from fellowships

Assessment and surveys from support offices

ADA accommodations

Multidisciplinary studies

International studies

Freshman Seminars

Adult learning environments (night, weekend)

Smart classrooms

Online learning environment

FDC technologies

Information from extended campuses

Advising Center report

Web page design

Student affairs diversity activities

Connections

Internships

Study abroad

 

 

List any specific ways your campus creates effective learning environments in or out of the classroom.

 

Please attach electronic copies to this email of any supporting documents for evidence you list.

Core Component - 3d The organization’s learning resources support student learning and effective teaching.

Evidence from University

Evidence from your campus

Examples of Evidence The organization ensures access to the resources (e.g., research laboratories, libraries, performance spaces, clinical practice sites) necessary to support learning and teaching. The organization evaluates the use of its learning resources to enhance student learning and effective teaching.

The organization regularly assesses the effectiveness of its learning resources to support learning and teaching.

The organization supports students, staff, and faculty in using technology effectively. The organization provides effective staffing and support for its learning resources. The organization’s systems and structures enable partnerships and innovations that enhance student learning and strengthen teaching effectiveness.

Budgeting priorities reflect that improvement in teaching and learning is a core value of the organization.

Library self-study and exhibits

Academic Resource Center services

Lab/clinical spaces-main and extended campuses

Theater/dance/music spaces/ Loretto-Hilton expansion

Science building plans

SBT building plans

SOC renovation plans

Student teaching

Computer labs—main and extended campuses

Media Center

IT User Services FDC technology support

Academic Technology Committee

University partnerships (http://www.webster.edu/about/facts/partnerships)

Budget data from FDC, IT, and Office of Assessment

 

At the ALBU/KIRT campuses we offer a mandatory New Student Orientation each term.  Students receive administrative information, receive an introduction to research in the local area and then meet with their area mentors.

(New Student Orientation PPT attached.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Laura Rein, Dean of University Library

Webster University

470 East Lockwood Avenue

St. Louis MO  63119

Tel: 314.968.7152   Fax: 314.963.6085

Email:  lrein@webster.edu