Narrative Outline of the REPUBLIC


POLITEIA



Book I

Socrates had gone to to the harbor (Piraeus) to see a new festival and was returning to Athens when Polemarchus persuaded him to stop to see Polemarchus' father, an old and revered business named Cephalus. [Names are important in the Republic. Some, like Glaucon and Adiemantus refer to real people, in the cases in point, brothers of Plato, who is not reported as having been present at the conversation. Others, while conceivably names of historical individuals, are evocative of their character in the argument. Examples include Polemarchus, which means "leader in battle," and was the name given to the third archon; Cephalus, meaning "head" as in head of the family; and Thrasymachus, meaning "schemer."]
Socrates' brief exchange with Cephalus, who soon excuses himself, sets the frame for the entire conversation. Cephalus is old. He is aware that age has its burdens, but in his case these burdens are relieved by his wealth, which enables him to pay his debts, both to gods and to men, and to say what he thinks, without subterfuge or deceit. Speaking the truth and paying one's debts: this, according to Cephalus, is right, just, & honorable.
At this point Cephalus retires, to see to the sacrifices. Polemarchus, his son, "inherits" the argument. He quotes the poet Simonides, to the effect that justice is giving everyone their due. Socrates goes to work examining this claim, posing puzzles and troubles with it. Despite the fact that he shifts ground repeatedly, Polemarchus eventually has to admit that he cannot defend his definition. This is where the Sophist Thrasymachus makes his snarling entry. He scorns the Socratic method, and is eventually drawn into the argument. justice, he says is the interest of the stronger. Might makes right. Everything else is camouflage. A vigorous argument follows, with Socrates employing many of his ironic and rhetorical tricks. [Republic Book I is often thought to be an independent early Socratic dialog, an example of Socratic ELENCHUS.] Thrasymachus appeals to a sober, unblinkered view of the facts: people who can get away with so-called "injustice" do so regularly, repeatedly and with impunity. Eventually Thrasymachus wearies of the argument (it is not at all clear that he is refuted or even convinced.) He withdraws as Socrates remarks that they are now still without a clear and defensible definition of justice.




Book II

Socrates has pushed all the buttons and played his tricks, but Glaucon & Adiemantus are not convinced. They suspect that Thrasymachus wearied of the argument, not that Socrates actually convinced or refuted him. They venture the opinion that Socrates must be nearly alone among men in believing that justice (DIKAIOSYNE) and ARETE are instrinsically desirable. In their view, the vast majority will act unjustly if they can do so to their own benefit and with impunity. Where justice is honored, it is always honored for its consequences. They expand on this view, which they attribute to Thrasymachus, with discomfort. They want not to believe that it is so, but their faith in their fellow human beings has been shaken. They entreat Socrates to establish that being just & acting justly are their own reward. Socrates agrees to try. The argument that begins at this point is not completed until Book IX.
A crucial move in the development of the argument occurs at this point. Socrates suggests that justice will be easier to recognize and to define in a city-state (POLIS) than in an individual, particularly if we conduct what we in the 20c C.E would come to call a thought experiment. The POLIS is the individual WRIT LARGE. So the argument begins with speculation about the foundation of an ideal POLIS. Initially this will be a small, circumscribed community brought together by the economics of basic material needs. Glaucon in particular finds this vision crude and unsatisfactory: he labels Socrates' idea a "city of pigs." In response, Socrates develops the implications and effects of the introduction of more "creature-comforts" and luxuries, chief among them war. The more luxurious POLIS inevitably is at risk from its neighbors and therefore must raise an army. With luxury and enhanced trade both the threat of war (and the necessity of defense) and the subdivision and specialization of labor inevitably follow. The POLIS requires Guardians (PHYLAKES.) As the argument of the Republic develops, the the role of the Guardians assumes greater and greater significance.
What attributes will the ideal POLIS require of its Guardians? [The Guardians swiftly acquire the characteristics of a separate class.] This question leads inexorably to an investigation into the goals and techniques of education (PAIDEIA.) What should children be taught, and when? This in turn leads to a discussion of censorship. Are there stories (especially about the gods) that children should not be told.?

Return to Index to the REPUBLIC



Book III

The discussion of censorship & of the role of poetry in education continues. Socrates cites a number of questionable passages from Homer which cannot, he thinks, be allowed in education, since they represent dishonorable behavior and encourage the fear of death. The dramatic form of much of this poetry is also suspect: it puts unworthy words into the mouths of gods & heroes. (Socrates suggests that what we would call "direct quotation" must be strictly limited to morally elevating speech. Nothing can be permitted that compromises the education of the Guardians.) Rhythm & music must also be carefully selected. Simplicity & balance are the keys to physical education as well. Where harm has been done remedies must be applied. Socrates sketches the judicial and medical remedies, tossing in some scathing remarks about contemporary medical practice.
But the crucial question is: Who should rule? Those undergoing education must be regularly tested. Only the most devoted should qualify. They must pass all the tests. The Guardian class will eventually be divided into two groups: those who will be trained to rule and their assistants. The nub of the issue is character. Socrates relates the famous myth of the metals. Among human natures there are golden, silver, bronze and iron types. Education & training must identify the golden natures. They will rule. All the Guardians (both the gold and the silver) will be charged with the defense of the POLIS against its enemies, external and internal. There will be a strict conflict of interest provision: Guardians will be prohibited from owning private property, but their needs, not to extend to profligacy or luxury, will be supplied at state expense.

Return to Index to the REPUBLIC



Book IV

Adiemantus objects: denying the Guardians private property will make them unhappy, and will turn them into hired employees. Socrates replies that, although he beleives many Guardians will be happy under the conditions he has sketched, the happiness of one goup or class is not the issue. It is the greatest happiness (EUDAIMONIA) of the POLIS that is at stake. Every class must exercise its own special function. Extremes of both wealth and poverty must be avoided, since they will undermine the unity of the POLIS. The Guardians must remain particularly vigiliant about education, since if the youth are brought up and educated properly (and, as he indicates in passing, in common), all sorts of petty legislative questions that vex actual cities will be avoided. This means that attention must be given even to the stories children are told. As for religion, Socrates is content to leave that to Apollo.
Our POLIS, Socrates says, is now established. Where is justice to be found in it? He inventories the four cardinal virtues: wisdom, courage, moderation, & justice. Wisdom will be found among the rulers; courage among the guardians; moderation (SOPHROSYNE) in everyone's being content with his own role in the POLIS. Justice (DIAKIOSYNE) is, therefore, the smooth ordering of society that results from everyone fulfilling his own special role and not meddling in the proper functions of others. Injustice, by contrast, consists precisely in such meddling.
Having now found justice "writ large" in the POLIS, how can we translate this to the individual? By analogy, Socrates suggests, justice in the individual will be the harmonious functioning of independent parts, each fulfilling its own appropriate function. But analogy alone cannot establish so important a point, according to Socrates, which leads him into an examination as to whether the soul is actually divisible into discrete capacities or parts. A detailed investigation establishes that the soul has indeed three parts (reason, spirit, and appetite) that correspond to the three basic classes in the POLIS. Justice in the individual is, therefore, the condition under which each part of the soul fulfills its own special function, governed by reason, with spirit, as reason requires, restraining the passions (appetite.) Injustice in the individual is, by contrast, the state of imbalance and disorder, in which passions and drives rebel against the wise counsel of reason. Socrates remarks that there are four such ways in which disorder and rebellion can arise in the POLIS and/or the individual.

Return to Index to the REPUBLIC



Book V

Socrates is about the classify the kinds of vices that cities and individuals are prone to, but his interlocutors, led by Polemarchus, force him to go back to his passing remark that wives and children of the Guardians will be held in common. In response Socrates discusses gender differences. Although men are on average stronger and more capable than women, the skills of political leadership (ruling) are not sex-linked. Thus there will be female Guardians as well as male. All Guardians will have the same responsibilities (including fighting in wars) and must share the same training & education. The traditional family & marriage are obstacles to the education, rearing, and outlook of the Guardians. They must, therefore, be abolished for this class, because they create and foster affection for particular individuals. Unions for the sake of procreation will be temporary and arranged at festivals by subterfuge under carefully guarded conditions that will ensure that the socially most desirable pairings are achieved. For this purpose a rigged balloting system will be engineered by the rulers. Parents will not know their own children. Children will be rasied in common. In times of war both women and men will fight, and provisions will be made for the children to witness the fighting from a safe vantage point. Wars between Greek cities must be regarded as civil wars and prosecuted accordingly. Even with barbarians war must be conducted according to what might be called "civilized" rules.
Glaucon now forces the obvious question. Is this POLIS that you have imagined even possible? Only, says Socrates, if the philosophers become rulers or (BASILEIS) (or if the rulers become philosophers.) This leads to an account of the Forms, by means of which Socrates differentiates most human beings, captivated as they are by changing sights, sounds, and pleasures, from the philosophers, the "lovers of wisdom," who seek the real, unchanging objects of true knolwedge.

Return to Index to the REPUBLIC



Book VI

The Philosopher is a lover of forms. How does one become a philosopher? From his/her fundamental commitment to truth, the philosopher can be seen to have a number of special qualities, including the traditional moral virtues and also including other qualities that are not rarely found in combination, such as quickness combined with steadfastness and resoluteness. Adiemantus breaks in to say, that although Socrates can manage to compel his interlocutors' agreement step by step in a carefully structured conversation, even he must admit that most people regard philosophers as foolish, impractical, and often wicked. That's true, Socrates admits. But imagine a ship on which the crew believes that holding the wheel is true navigating and that consulting the positions of the stars is foolish speculation. As for wickedness, when a man or woman of great philosophic ability is seduced by power, ambition or gain, the results can indeed be dangerous.
Philosophers must be capable of the most advanced studies, the study of the Good. When asked for an account of the Good, Socrates says he can only point to things most like it. The Good, he says, is to the true world as the sun is to the visible world. This metaphor is immediately followed by another, the Line, which illustrates the upward journey of the philosopher through the ascending scale of reality and knowledge, from passing sensation to the vision of the forms.

Return to Index to the REPUBLIC



Book VII

Book VII opens with perhaps the most famous image Plato ever produced: the so-called "myth of the cave." The chained prisoners in the dark cave spend their days predicting the order of appearance of shadow images of crude puppets paraded behind them and reflected by the light of a fire at their backs of which they are ignorant on the wall they are forced to face. One of the prisoners eventually escapes his shackles and learns the truth of the shadow theater they observe. Eventually he finds his way out of the cave and, by the light of the sun, sees the "real" world of which their shadowy procession is a pale image, several times removed. Suppose, Socrates now says, that for the sake of his people this visitor from the nether world returns to the cave. His eyes will not readily adjust to his darkened surroundings. He will no longer be adept at predicting what image will appear next. He will have lost his skill at their game. Yet if he dares try to tell his erstwhile fellow prisoners the truth of what he has seen, they will denounce him as mad, and, if he persists, may grow so tired of his tedious tales that they kill him.
What should be the education of that subset of the Guardian class who are by nature fit to become philosopher-rulers? Genuine education is not putting what we would call "facts" into people's heads. It is somehow enticing them to look in the correct place, in the right direction. Since genuine knowledge cannot be coerced, education (PAIDEIA) must begin with playfulness. What subjects will help students learn to learn? Mathematics, followed by logic & dialectic, followed by a fifteen year apprenticeship in the practical world of politics (from age 35 to 50.) Only then can the final stages of the education (as the French would say formation) of the philosopher-ruler begin. Book VII ends with a reminder that some of these "philosopher-kings" will be women.

Return to Index to the REPUBLIC



Book VIII

Glaucon now reminds Socrates of the topic he had introduced in Book IV: four kinds of progressively worse cities (and the corresponding types of individuals.) So Socrates begins a lengthy account of the decline and corruption of the ideal POLIS. The obvious first question is why the ideal POLIS should suffer decline and erosion at all. The answer, Socrates explains in extremely elevated poetic language, is that whatever is born must die, according to a mathematical principle, which is expressed here as the so-called "Myth of the Platonic number." Complicated astrological calculations will regulate the precise timings of the fertility festivals. Errors in these calculations will result in iron and bronze types mixing with the golden and silver. When this happens the harmony of the ideal city will be compromised. Civil strife (STASIS) will arise from envy and hostility. The rulers, no longer governed by their best natures, seek compromises. They distribute land and private property, and concentrate their own activities on war and defense. Society forms into economic classes: the rich own land and property, the poor become wage-earners and serfs. Emphasis is on honor and martial arts (Socrates seems to have Sparta in mind.) Art " cutlure are neglected and education deteriorates. The rulers now secretly love money, but they cannot admit that they do. In the corresponding individual, the spirited element predominates over the rational.
At the next stage, money is openly prized, desired, and sought after. Wealth is now a sign of honor, and a qualification for high office. The gap between the rich and poor widens. This type of individual must still exercise restraint of the appetites & self-control but for the wrong reasons. By the third and following stage, self-control has disappeared completely. All desires are equal. We have arrived at the stage of democracy. Like the preceding stages in the decline of the POLIS, democracy is inherently unstable. Liberty has turned to licentiousness, and this leads inevitably to tyranny and complete loss of freedom. The people name a champion dictator, and grant him bodyguards. He seizes all power and privilege for himself.

Return to Index to the REPUBLIC



Book IX

The tyrannical or dictatorial type is the unjust individual whose life Glaucon challenged Socrates (see Book II) to compare in terms of happiness with Socrates' ideal of the just individual. To establish his position, Socrates must further clarify the character of the tyrannical type. This involves introducing a distinction between necessary & unnecessary desires. The latter are "lawless." They exist in all of us, and often overwhelm us in our dreams. But the tyrannical personality cannot control them by day. It knows nothing of friendship, and conceives all human relationships in terms of masters and slaves. The tyrant leads a fearful life; enemies are everywhere. Unrestrained appetites undermine all the pleasures, those associated with each part of the soul.
Socrates compares and contrasts three lives: the philosophic, the ambitious, and the appetitive. The representatives of each life think theirs the most pleasant, but the philosopher alone can truly judge, since (s)he has experience of all three types and has the skills of judgment. Pleasure is not just the absence of pain, but ordinary pleasures are mingled with pain. The philosophical pleasures are unalloyed with pain, and are truer, more real, and more permanent. In fact, the dictator is 729 times more miserable than the philosopher-rulers. The tyrannical, unjust person is like a humanoid creature that has within it a wild beast, a lion, and a human being. Only where reason gains control can moderation, harmony, justice, and true happiness obtain.

Return to Index to the REPUBLIC



Book X

Book X begins with Socrates' returning to the question of poetry and "imitative art" (see Book III.) Imitation is at three removes from the Forms and truth: it imitates the appearance of particulars. Moreover it appeals to our emotions, not to our reason. The ban on tragedy, comedy, and poetry cannot be lifted.
Next Socrates investigates whether the soul is immortal. A thing can be destroyed, Socrates argues, only by its own peculiar evil. But death does not make people more unjust. It is not an evil, hence it cannot destroy the just soul.
Justice has its rewards in this life: the just individual is truly happier. And it has everlasting rewards as well. REPUBLIC concludes with the great "Myth of Er" which relates the thousand-year cycle of reincarnation, penalties, and rewards leading to the punishment of the wicked and the triumph and everlasting happiness of the just soul.

Return to Index to the REPUBLIC



Eric Voegelin's "Organization of REPUBLIC" (after K. Hildebrand)
TOPICBook/ChapterStephanus Numbers
PROLOGUE
  • Descent to the PIRAEUS
  • CEPHALUS: Justice of the Older Generation
  • POLEMARCHUS: Justice of the Middle Generation
  • THRASYMACHUS: Justice of the Sophist
  • I.1
  • I.2-I.5
  • I.6-I.9
  • I.10-I.24
  • 327a-328b
  • 328b-331d
  • 331e-336a
  • 336b-354c
INTRODUCTION
  • The Question: Is Justice better than Injustice?
  • II.1-II.10
  • 357a-369b
Part I: Genesis & Order of the POLIS
  • Genesis of the POLIS
  • Education of the Guardians
  • Constitution of the POLIS
  • Justice in the POLIS
  • II.11-II.16
  • II.17-III.18
  • III.19-IV.5
  • IV.6-IV.19
  • 369b-376e
  • 376e-412b
  • 412b-427c
  • 427c-445e
Part II: Embodiment of the Ideal
  • Somatic Unit of the POLIS & the Hellenes
  • Rule of the Philosophers
  • The Idea of the AGATHON
  • Education of the Philosophers
  • V.1-V.16
  • V.17-VI.14
  • VI.15-VII.5
  • VII.6-VII.18
  • 449a-471c
  • 471c-502c
  • 502c-521c
  • 521c-541b
Part III: Decline of the POLIS
  • Timocracy
  • Oligarchy
  • Democracy
  • Tyranny
  • VIII.1-VIII.5
  • VIII.6-VIII.9
  • VIII.10-VIII.13
  • VIII.14-IX.3
  • 543a-550c
  • 550c-555b
  • 555b-562a
  • 562a-576b
Conclusion
  • The Answer: Justice is better than Injustice
  • IX.4-IX.13
  • 576b-592b
Epilogue
  • Rejection of the Mimetic Art
  • Immortality of the Soul
  • Rewards of Justice in Life
  • Judgment of the Dead
  • X.1-X.8
  • X.9-X.11
  • X.12
  • X.13-X.16
  • 595a-608b
  • 608c-612a
  • 612a-613e
  • 613e-631d



revised October 9, 1996


Index to Study Guides to Plato / Return to main menu